About 48 minutes
...Or Your Money Back — A Closer Reading
Machines Inventions Early Science Fiction
10,877 recorded words. 3 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #23534The catalog record for The Draw — Reading Notes provides practical reading context through 10,278 words, 45 min estimated reading time, and 2 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 14.5 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Science fiction,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Explore this collection
These alternatives are selected using recorded categories and estimated reading time.
About 48 minutes
Machines Inventions Early Science Fiction
10,877 recorded words. 3 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #23534About 42 minutes
Machines Inventions Early Science Fiction
9,472 recorded words. 3 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #31009About 41 minutes
Machines Inventions Early Science Fiction
9,258 recorded words. 4 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #65070Search stored excerpts and compare books → Choose by your preferences →
Choices use stored catalog measurements. Estimates vary with reading speed. A shared category is a catalog label, not a claim that two books have the same argument or literary quality.
Search reads excerpt text stored with this catalog and links to its associated Gutenberg record. The connection is stored in the site database; this tool does not recheck that every excerpt is word-for-word identical to that external record. Excerpt search does not cover every chapter and does not verify historical publication dates.
Catalog snapshot checked: 2026-09-25. Coverage: 100 public books, 100 available source excerpts.
Read the complete public-domain text at its original source.
Read on Project GutenbergJerome Bixby's 1954 story 'The Draw' opens with a first-person narrator, cowhand Joe Doolin, who establishes a colloquial, skeptical voice. The tale immediately subverts the western gunfighter trope: Buck Tarrant is described as a 'bony runt' with buck teeth, a bully who 'bleat[s] like a two-day calf' to avoid fair fights. Yet his draw is supernaturally fast—not from skill but from telekinesis, a term introduced by a visiting professor. The story's catalog subjects list 'Science fiction,' 'Western stories,' and 'Psychic ability,' and the excerpts bear out this hybrid: the setting and diction are pure western, while the central gimmick is pure SF.
Joe Doolin's narration shapes every detail. He admits he 'never had much of anything exciting happen' and frames Buck's earlier fumbling draws with comic contempt: 'his old Peacemaker would come staggering out of his holster like a bear in heat.' This folksy, judgmental voice colors the reader's perception of Buck as a coward and a cheat. Yet Doolin is also an eyewitness to the impossible draw, and his credibility is never questioned within the story. The excerpts leave unclear whether Doolin's biases distort the events or merely add color. The reader must weigh his testimony against the professor's clinical reaction—'Telekinesis,' he says 'almost reverently'—which provides a contrasting, scientific lens.
The story's SF element is tightly focused: Buck can teleport only his own gun into his hand, and only when he 'want[s] to so very badly.' Attempts to move a bottle or glass fail, producing only a 'shiver' or a 'fraction of an inch.' This limitation ties the power directly to the western icon of the six-shooter. The professor's suggestion to test distance is met with Buck's paranoid refusal: 'I'd maybe get my gun over there and not be able to get it back.' The excerpts do not reveal whether Buck's gift has any broader application or consequence; the narrative remains anchored to the standoff in the saloon, where the sheriff is expected but has not yet arrived.
The catalog lists both 'Western stories' and 'Science fiction,' and the excerpts show the story deliberately playing the two against each other. The setting—a Pass, a saloon, a sheriff—is classic western, but the professor's dialogue introduces terms like 'telekinesis' and 'psychic forces' that belong to SF. Buck's response—'Telewhat?'—highlights the clash. The story's word count (10,278) suggests a compact narrative that likely resolves this tension in a single scene. The excerpts end with Buck threatening the professor and waiting for the sheriff, leaving the outcome ambiguous. Readers familiar with Bixby's other work may recognize his tendency toward twist endings, but the excerpts provide no hint of one here.
Readers should attend to how the western vernacular frames the SF concept: Doolin's plain speech makes the impossible seem almost mundane. The story's brevity means every detail—Buck's buck teeth, the professor's scientific curiosity, the absent sheriff—may carry weight. Consider whether the tale ultimately endorses or undercuts the idea that psychic power could replace gunfighting skill, and note how the first-person perspective limits what we know about Buck's inner life.
Reading how Tarrant’s gun simply appears in his palm, I remembered sitting on my grandfather’s porch, the way he’d tell stories of quick draws and slow fates. That same hush came over me with Conditionally Human, where the line between power and personhood blurs so gently you almost miss it. Conditionally Human — A Reader’s Guide lingered like a half-finished dream, the kind you don’t rush back to, but never quite leave.
Use these questions to collect your thoughts before moving on.